Consider Float
Choose Float when visual scheduling and delivery economics are the primary planning needs.
Dedicated resource planning comparison
Allocyn and Float
Compare Float and Allocyn for project work, staffing, time, and costs.
Reviewed 4 September 2026
Compare billing and trial terms.
Per active person appearing on the schedule. Starter is $7 per scheduled person per month, Pro is $12, and Enterprise is custom priced.
- ✓A 30-day Pro trial with unlimited teammates is available without a card.
- ✓Prices exclude taxes, optional services, usage charges, and temporary promotions unless the vendor states otherwise.
Compare key capabilities.
These highlights are not exhaustive. Availability depends on the plan and configuration; use the linked sources to check specific requirements.
| Review area | Float | Allocyn |
|---|---|---|
| Current published emphasis | Dedicated resource planning
| Connected project and resource planning
|
| Confirm before purchase | Verify current package scope, limits, implementation needs, and pricing in the linked provider sources. | Verify current Allocyn package scope, limits, migration needs, and pricing in the live catalog and proposed order. |
Choose the fit for your team.
Consider Allocyn
Consider Allocyn when those planning needs should sit alongside broader project execution, requests, permissions, and reporting.
Compare a schedule-led workflow with a delivery-led workspace.
Start from the visual schedule used to decide who works on which phase and when. Float should be tested for scheduling clarity, availability, time off, project estimates, and the Pro-level time and financial views listed in its materials. Allocyn should be tested for the path from project work and resource requests through allocation, capacity, time, budget, permissions, and reporting.
Count every active person who would appear on the Float schedule, not only administrators or people who log in. Confirm whether Pro is required for rates, costs, margins, or advanced reporting, then compare that amount with the applicable Allocyn package. Include historic assignments, leave, project phases, rate access, exports, and any integration used to keep project execution aligned with the schedule.
Schedule usability
Ask a planner to move a phase, account for leave, and resolve an overlapping assignment. Check whether the effect remains understandable across the whole planning period.
Economic context
Use one project estimate and representative rate, cost, and margin information. Verify the Float tier and permissions needed for each reviewer.
Delivery handoff
Follow the changed allocation into tasks, actual time, status, and the next report. Document every synchronization or manual update required.
Move one project phase and inspect every consequence.
Choose a project with milestones, a planned phase, leave, competing work, recorded time, and a commercial forecast. Move the phase in both products, resolve the resulting availability conflict, and ask delivery and finance reviewers to explain the updated position. Confirm which information stays current automatically and which records still need a separate owner.
- ✓Use the same scheduled people and leave dates.
- ✓Include one Pro-level financial requirement.
- ✓Check rate and margin visibility by role.
- ✓Review task and reporting handoffs after the move.
- ✓Calculate cost from active scheduled people.
Verify the latest information before buying.
Float pricing
Float pricingFloat pricing guide
Float pricing guideAbout this comparison
Allocyn is not affiliated with or endorsed by Float. Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. Features and prices may change; confirm the selected plan and terms before buying.