Consider Asana
Choose Asana when broad collaborative project and portfolio management is the main requirement.
Broad work platform comparison
Allocyn and Asana
Compare Asana and Allocyn for project work, staffing, time, and costs.
Reviewed 4 September 2026
Compare billing and trial terms.
Per paid user using seat bundles. Personal is free for up to two users. Starter is $10.99 per user per month annually or $13.49 monthly; Advanced is $24.99 or $30.49, and Enterprise is custom priced.
- ✓A free Advanced trial is available without a card. The current general trial information does not state one universal duration.
- ✓Prices exclude taxes, optional services, usage charges, and temporary promotions unless the vendor states otherwise.
Compare key capabilities.
These highlights are not exhaustive. Availability depends on the plan and configuration; use the linked sources to check specific requirements.
| Review area | Asana | Allocyn |
|---|---|---|
| Current published emphasis | Broad work platform
| Connected project and resource planning
|
| Confirm before purchase | Verify current package scope, limits, implementation needs, and pricing in the linked provider sources. | Verify current Allocyn package scope, limits, migration needs, and pricing in the live catalog and proposed order. |
Choose the fit for your team.
Consider Allocyn
Consider Allocyn when resource demand, capacity, time, and project economics should be first-class connected workflows.
Separate collaborative work management from resource operating depth.
Use a portfolio that includes intake, tasks, dependencies, goals, status reporting, and workload review to test Asana's collaborative project model. Alongside it, define the resource decision that needs dated demand, roles, skills, availability, allocations, actual effort, budget, and forecast context. Allocyn should be assessed on that connected planning sequence rather than on the number of general work views it can reproduce.
Map each Asana requirement to Personal, Starter, Advanced, or Enterprise before calculating the bundled paid seats. Portfolio workload is listed on Advanced, broader workload and capacity controls are associated with Enterprise, and timesheets or budgets are sold separately. Compare the resulting package and add-ons with the Allocyn package needed for the same participants, financial access, reporting, identity, migration, and support requirements.
Collaboration model
Test the forms, rules, project views, goals, and portfolio reporting that teams would use day to day. Record the conventions and administration they require.
Resource evidence
Create dated demand and an allocation conflict, then determine how skills, capacity, actual time, and budget evidence reach the decision.
Seat and add-on scope
Use the real paid-user bundle and identify every Enterprise, timesheet, or budget requirement before comparing recurring totals.
Follow a portfolio commitment into a staffing decision.
Choose two projects that share a specialist and have different goals, dependencies, dates, and financial context. Capture the work, review portfolio status, expose the workload conflict, and decide what moves. Ask the project and resource owners to explain which evidence supported the decision, then verify the package, add-ons, exports, and access boundaries used in each product.
- ✓Use the same projects, goals, and responsible people.
- ✓Include one intake form and one workflow rule.
- ✓Test workload at the proposed Asana tier.
- ✓Trace actual time and budget information explicitly.
- ✓Calculate the paid-seat bundle and separate products.
Verify the latest information before buying.
Asana pricing
Asana pricingAsana trial information
Asana trial informationAbout this comparison
Allocyn is not affiliated with or endorsed by Asana. Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. Features and prices may change; confirm the selected plan and terms before buying.