Consider Teamdeck
Choose Teamdeck when a lean scheduling, time, and leave product with two member types fits the operating model.
Dedicated resource planning comparison
Allocyn and Teamdeck
Compare Teamdeck and Allocyn for project work, staffing, time, and costs.
Reviewed 4 September 2026
Compare billing and trial terms.
$6 per month for a Full Member with access and $2 per month for a Light Member managed by full members. Annual billing saves 10 percent and there is no minimum commitment.
- ✓A 14-day trial with all features is available without a card.
- ✓Prices exclude taxes, optional services, usage charges, and temporary promotions unless the vendor states otherwise.
Compare key capabilities.
These highlights are not exhaustive. Availability depends on the plan and configuration; use the linked sources to check specific requirements.
| Review area | Teamdeck | Allocyn |
|---|---|---|
| Current published emphasis | Dedicated resource planning
| Connected project and resource planning
|
| Confirm before purchase | Verify current package scope, limits, implementation needs, and pricing in the linked provider sources. | Verify current Allocyn package scope, limits, migration needs, and pricing in the live catalog and proposed order. |
Choose the fit for your team.
Consider Allocyn
Consider Allocyn when project execution, requests, profitability, reports, and access controls also need to be connected.
Match the member model to the way the team participates.
Classify everyone who would use or appear in the planning process before applying Teamdeck pricing. Its Full and Light member distinction may suit an organization that wants lean scheduling, time, leave, and customizable reporting. Allocyn should be tested when those records must remain tied to project execution, formal resource demand, budgets, profitability views, permissions, and recurring management reports.
Do not compare a small administrator count with a larger delivery population. Assign the proposed Full or Light type to each Teamdeck person, apply the annual discount only to the annual case, and compare the full amount with Allocyn active-member and package assumptions. Document who builds reports, who approves time or leave, and which project, client, and finance records must move between systems.
Member classification
Place each planner, manager, team member, and managed person into the proposed Teamdeck member type. Confirm that the intended activity fits that type.
Reporting ownership
Build the utilization, budget, rate, revenue, or payroll report the team actually uses and identify who validates every source field.
Project boundary
Follow a scheduling change into project work, request approval, profitability review, and access control to expose any manual handoff.
Test the weekly scheduling and reporting rhythm.
Choose a team with Full and Light participants, two projects, planned leave, submitted time, and one utilization or budget report. Ask the planner to rebalance work and the reporting owner to explain the result. Repeat the same decision in Allocyn with project demand and financial permissions included, then compare administration effort and complete recurring cost.
- ✓Use the intended Full and Light member mix.
- ✓Include leave and an overlapping booking.
- ✓Reconcile scheduled and recorded time.
- ✓Validate one customized management report.
- ✓Compare monthly and discounted annual totals separately.
Verify the latest information before buying.
Teamdeck pricing
Teamdeck pricingTeamdeck payment guide
Teamdeck payment guideAbout this comparison
Allocyn is not affiliated with or endorsed by Teamdeck. Product names and trademarks belong to their owners. Features and prices may change; confirm the selected plan and terms before buying.